B-298854; B-298854.2, Advanced Technology Systems, Inc., December 29, 2006
Case: B-298854
Agency:
Protester: B
Date: 2006-12-29
Denied
B-298854; B-298854.2, Advanced Technology Systems, Inc., December 29, 2006
TITLE: B-298854; B-298854.2, Advanced Technology Systems, Inc., December 29, 2006
BNUMBER: B-298854; B-298854.2
DATE: December 29, 2006
**************************************************************************
B-298854; B-298854.2, Advanced Technology Systems, Inc., December 29, 2006
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective
Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release.
Decision
Matter of: Advanced Technology Systems, Inc.
File: B-298854; B-298854.2
Date: December 29, 2006
William A. Roberts, III, Esq., Richard B. O'Keeffe, Jr., Esq., Michael S.
Caldwell, Esq., and Jon W. Burd, Esq., Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP, for the
protester.
John Bell, Esq., John Bell Law Office, for Binary Information Technology,
Inc., an intervenor.
Faisal Siddiqui, Esq., Export-Import Bank of the United States, for the
agency.
Paula A. Williams, Esq., and Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Protest challenging evaluation of quotations for information technology
(IT) services is denied where the record establishes that the agency's
evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the evaluation criteria and
the record supports the agency's source selection decision.
DECISION
Advanced Technology Systems, Inc. (ATS) protests the issuance of a task
order by the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank)[1] to
Binary Information Technology, Inc. (BIT) under that firm's General
Services Administration (GSA) Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contract,
pursuant to request for quotations (RFQ) No. EXIM-06-Q-0019 to obtain IT
support services.[2] ATS challenges the agency's evaluation of quotations
and the subsequent decision to issue a task order to BIT, a vendor
submitting a higher technically rated, higher priced quotation.
We deny the protest.
BACKGROUND
On July 28, 2006, the Ex-Im Bank issued RFQ No. EXIM-06-Q-0019 to vendors
holding FSS contracts for IT services, stating that the agency intended to
award a fixed-price, labor-hour, level-of-effort task order for a base
year with four 1-year option periods. A primary objective of the
solicitation is to obtain IT support services for "EXIM Online"--that is,
the agency's recently-developed "fully integrated web-based transaction
processing system for the insurance and medium term guarantee
business."[3] RFQ SOW, at 2. The solicitation reflected a combination of
requirements previously performed under other contracts by three vendors:
ATS, BIT, and BearingPoint, Inc. BearingPoint built and developed the EXIM
Online system under a contract that ran from September 2001 to
September 2006; BIT and ATS are each incumbent contractors that have
performed various IT services for the Ex-Im Bank, including: Oracle
database administration support, software quality assurance (QA) services,
J2EE (Java 2 Platform Enterprise Edition) development and workflow support
for the EXIM Online system, Lotus Notes efforts, and website support.
The solicitation's SOW described the principal objectives of this
requirement as follows: (1) to acquire system development life cycle
(SDLC) support to sustain and enhance the agency's unique and
custom-designed EXIM Online system; and (2) to provide programming,
maintenance and enhancement support for the content of Ex-Im Bank's
internal and external websites. RFQ SOW, at 2. The SOW advised vendors
that the anticipated scope of work would cover three software development
environments: (1) Java applications,[4] including the primary application
J2EE and four Documentum applications;[5] (2) Lotus Notes applications;
and (3) Ex-Im Bank's internal and external websites. Id. at 2-3.
The SOW required vendors to propose personnel, materials, and equipment to
perform the following functions--transition, SDLC support, [6] web
maintenance, and QA testing--and provided the following estimated levels
of effort projected for each function:
Function Hours
1. J2EE 13440
2. Lotus Notes 3840
3. Web Maintenance 3360
4.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...