B-310823; B-310823.2; B-310823.4, Global Computer Enterprises, Inc., January 31, 2008
Case: B-310823
Agency:
Protester: B
Date: 2008-01-31
Dismissed
B-310823; B-310823.2; B-310823.4, Global Computer Enterprises, Inc., January 31, 2008
TITLE: B-310823; B-310823.2; B-310823.4, Global Computer Enterprises, Inc., January 31, 2008
BNUMBER: B-310823; B-310823.2; B-310823.4
DATE: January 31, 2008
*************************************************************************************
B-310823; B-310823.2; B-310823.4, Global Computer Enterprises, Inc., January 31, 2008
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective
Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release.
Decision
Matter of: Global Computer Enterprises, Inc.
File: B-310823; B-310823.2; B-310823.4
Date: January 31, 2008
Lawrence J. Sklute, Esq., Sklute & Associates, for the protester.
William L. Walsh, Jr., Esq., J. Scott Hommer, III, Esq., Patrick R.
Quigley, Esq., and Peter A. Riesen, Esq., Venable LLP, for QSS Group,
Inc., an intervenor.
Timothy A. Chenault, Esq., U.S. Coast Guard, for the agency.
Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
1. Protest challenging the issuance of modifications to a task order under
an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ) contract as being
beyond the scope of the task order is dismissed; Government Accountability
Office lacks jurisdiction to consider whether a modification is beyond the
scope of the task order.
2. Protest that the agency improperly bundled work requirements previously
performed by separate small businesses by means of the modification of an
ID/IQ task order being performed by a small business is dismissed given
the statutory bar on protests concerning the issuance of task orders.
DECISION
Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. (GCE) protests the decision of the U.S.
Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security, to obtain federal financial
information technology support services through modifications to a task
order issued to QSS Group, Inc. under a multiple-award,
indefinite-delivery/indefinite quantity (ID/IQ) contract. GCE principally
maintains that these services are beyond the scope of QSS's task order,
and that by acquiring them under the task order, the Coast Guard has
engaged in improper bundling.
We dismiss the protest.
BACKGROUND
In 1999, the Department of Transportation awarded the Information
Technology Omnibus Procurement (ITOP) II contract, a multiple-award, ID/IQ
government-wide acquisition contract (GWAC)[1] for a broad range of
information technology (IT) hardware, software, and services.[2]
Specifically, ITOP II was awarded to a total of 35 large, small, and
small-disadvantaged businesses, including QSS (a small disadvantaged
business), with a base period of 7 years and a not-to-exceed ceiling of
$10 billion.[3] Additionally, ITOP II permitted individual agencies across
the federal government to meet their various IT requirements through the
issuance of fixed-price, time-and-materials, and/or cost-reimbursement
task orders to the contract holders.[4] See ITOP II Overview (available at
http://www.gsa.gov); see also GAO-02-734, Contract Management: Interagency
Contract Program Fees Need More Oversight (Washington, D.C., July 2002),
App. XI: Governmentwide Acquisition Contract Data Sheet--Department of
Transportation.
On June 9, 2005, the Coast Guard issued task order No. HSCGG3-05-F-TWV436
to QSS under the vendor's ITOP II contract for systems engineering and
technical services (hereinafter, SETS II) at a total estimated cost of
$204,628,568.[5] The SETS II task order included a 1-month transition
period and a 6-month base period, together with four 1-year options and
one 5-month option, for a total performance period of 5 years. The
statement of work described the general scope of the task order as
"software engineering and technical services that apply to existing and
future computer systems and communications networks designated by the
[agency] for SETS II support under this Task Order," and listed numerous
types of IT services to be provided under the SETS II task order. Agency
Report (AR), Tab 10, SETS II Task Order, sect. C, at 1. The SETS II
statement of work also described the specific types of IT services to be
performed (e.g., software development and maintenance, system
administration, database administration) as well as the current Coast
Guard systems upon which these IT services were to be provided. Id. at
19-88.
Prior to September 25, 2007, the Coast Guard had not procured its federal
financial IT support services by means of the SETS II task order.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...