B-311004; B-311004.2, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc., March 28, 2008
Case: B-311004
Agency:
Protester: B
Date: 2008-03-28
Denied
B-311004; B-311004.2, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc., March 28, 2008
TITLE: B-311004; B-311004.2, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc., March 28, 2008
BNUMBER: B-311004; B-311004.2
DATE: March 28, 2008
********************************************************************************
B-311004; B-311004.2, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc., March 28, 2008
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective
Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release.
Decision
Matter of: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.
File: B-311004; B-311004.2
Date: March 28, 2008
John S. Pachter, Esq., Jonathan D. Shaffer, Esq., Mary Pat Gregory, Esq.,
Le'Ontra B. Greenspan, Esq., and Kathryn T. Muldoon, Esq., Smith, Pachter,
McWhorter, for the protester.
Richard Sauber, Esq., Donald J. Russell, Esq., and Michael L. Waldman,
Esq., Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber, for Northrop
Grumman Corporation, the intervenor.
Maj. Walter R. Dukes, Kim Sawicki, Esq., John J. Reynolds, Esq., and James
F. Ford, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
David A. Ashen, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Protest against exclusion of protester's proposal from competitive range
(leaving only one proposal in the range) in procurement for airborne radar
is denied where agency reasonably determined that (1) protester's proposal
failed to satisfy solicitation requirement to substantiate compliance with
specifications and/or took exception to required levels of performance,
and (2) some of the deficiencies resulted from fundamental limitations on
performance of protester's proposed radar system, or otherwise would
require a major rewrite to correct.
DECISION
General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. (GA) protests the exclusion of
its proposal from the competitive range under request for proposals (RFP)
No. W15P7T-07-R-P406, issued by the U.S. Army Communication-Electronics
Command (CECOM), for production of a Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)/Ground
Moving Target Indicator (GMTI) system. GA primarily asserts that the
determination to exclude its proposal from the competitive range failed to
reasonably account for the performance of its proposed SAR/GMTI system in
the flight test conducted as part of the evaluation.
We deny the protest.
BACKGROUND
The SAR/GMTI system is a lightweight, high performance, all-weather,
multi-function radar system intended for use both on the Extended
Range/Multi-Purpose Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) and the Future Combat
Systems Class IV Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV). The SAR/GMTI system will
provide a battlefield commander with increased situational awareness by
imaging stationary targets with the Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and
detecting (ascertaining location, direction and velocity of) moving
targets with the Ground Moving Target Indicator (GMTI), even in adverse
weather and through battlefield obscurants (eg., smoke or dust).
A prior contract for system development and demonstration (SDD) of the
SAR/GMTI system, covering the design, fabrication, integration and test of
six articles (later increased to eight funded articles), was awarded to GA
on November 20, 2004. Although the original SDD schedule provided for
delivery of the test units 18 months after award, there has been a
significant delay in delivery. During two independent operational tests of
the SDD conducted by the Army Technical and Evaluation Command, the GMTI
mode of GA's system was found noncompliant with the test specifications.
While a new schedule was established under which eight systems were to be
accepted by March 2008, as of that time, only three systems had been
accepted, and these only through a waiver of some specifications.
Contracting Officer's Statement at 2; Hearing Transcript (Tr.) at
I/177-I/190.[1]
The solicitation here, issued on August 10, 2007, contemplated award of a
contract for an initial production quantity of 10 to 15 systems compliant
with the SAR/GMTI Performance Based Specification (PBS), dated August 2,
2007, with four 1-year production options for up to 35 systems each, and
two payload performance enhancement options. The solicitation divided the
performance requirements for the SAR/GMTI as set forth in the PBS into
three categories: Band A "[m}andatory critical system performance
requirements that must be met"; Band B "[s]ystem performance capabilities
with levels of performance that are Highly Desired"; and Band C "[s]ystem
performance capabilities with levels of performance that are Desired." RFP
sect.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...