A-Z Cleaning Solutions

Case: B-415228 Agency: Department of the Treasury : United States Mint Protester: A-Z Cleaning Solutions Date: 2017-11-06 Dismissed
View full decision with AI analysis on ProtestIntel →
B-415228 Nov 06, 2017 Jump To VIEW DECISION DOWNLOADS RELATED PAGES GAO CONTACTS Highlights A-Z Cleaning Solutions, of Pittsburg, California, protests the award of a contract to Clean Solutions Services, Inc., of San Francisco, California, under solicitation No. USM-SF-17-0004 issued by the Department of the Treasury, United States Mint for janitorial and laundry services in San Francisco. The protester contends that the agency erred in its evaluation of proposals and in its best-value tradeoff decision. We dismiss the protest for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss the protest for lack of jurisdiction. View Decision Decision Matter of:  A-Z  Cleaning Solutions File:  B-415228 Date:  November 6, 2017 David A. Rose, Esq., The Rose Consulting Law Firm, LLC, for the protester. Elizabeth Young, Esq., Department of the Treasury, for the agency. Michael Willems, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST The United States Mint, a federal agency within the Department of the Treasury, is not subject to the Government Accountability Office's bid protest jurisdiction under the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984, because the Mint is statutorily exempt from all federal procurement laws and regulations. DECISION A-Z Cleaning Solutions, of Pittsburg, California, protests the award of a contract to Clean Solutions Services, Inc., of San Francisco, California, under solicitation No. USM-SF-17-0004 issued by the Department of the Treasury, United States Mint for janitorial and laundry services in San Francisco.  The protester contends that the agency erred in its evaluation of proposals and in its best-value tradeoff decision. We dismiss the protest for lack of jurisdiction. The United States Mint, an agency within the United States Department of the Treasury, asserts that it is statutorily exempt from our bid protest jurisdiction, and therefore this protest should be dismissed.  We agree. Under the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984 (CICA), our Office has jurisdiction to resolve bid protests concerning solicitations and contract awards that are issued "by a Federal agency." 31 U.S.C. § 3551(1).  CICA provides that the term "Federal agency" has the meaning given in 40 U.S.C. § 102.  31 U.S.C.A. § 3551(3).  Section 102 of Title 40 defines the term "Federal agency" as including any "executive agency," which is defined as any executive department or independent establishment in the executive branch of the government."  40 U.S.C. § 102(4), (5).  The Mint, as part of the Department of the Treasury, is an executive agency that otherwise would be subject to our bid protest jurisdiction under CICA. In 1996, however, Congress established the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund (USMPEF) to finance the programs and operations of the Mint.  See Treasury, Postal Service, and General Government Appropriations Act, 1996, Pub L. No. 104-52, § 522 (1995) (codified as amended at 31 U.S.C. § 5136).  Of note, the establishing legislation for the USMPEF included the following proviso: "Provided further, That provisions of law governing procurement or public contracts shall not be applicable to the procurement of goods or services necessary for carrying out Mint programs and operations."  31 U.S.C. § 5136.  The same provision defines Mint programs and operations as follows: (1) the activities concerning, and assets utilized in, the production, administration, distribution, marketing, purchase, sale, and management of coinage, numismatic items, the protection and safeguarding of Mint assets and those non-Mint assets in the custody of the Mint, and the Fund; and (2) includes capital, personnel salaries and compensation, functions relating to operations, marketing, distribution, promotion, advertising, official reception and representation, the acquisition or replacement of equipment, the renovation or modernization of facilities, and the construction or acquisition of new buildings. Id.  The provision further contemplates that all receipts from Mint operations and programs be deposited in the USMPEF, and that all expenses incurred for operations and programs of the Mint that the Secretary of the Treasury determines to be ordinary and reasonable incidents of Mint operations and programs be paid out of the USMPEF.  Id.  As a result of these provisions, the agency represents that the Mint is entirely funded by and operates within the USMPEF.  Agency Response to Opposition to Request to Dismiss at 1. Because the establishing legislation provides that federal procurement laws and regulations do not apply to the procurement of goods or services necessary for carrying out the Mint's operations and programs, and those operations and programs are defined broadly enough to encompass substantially all of the Mint's activities, we conclude that the Mint is not subject to the terms of CICA.[1]  Furthermore, because the bid protest jurisdiction...

Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...