DynCorp International LLC
Case: B-415349
Agency: Department of Defense : Department of the Army
Protester: DynCorp International LLC
Date: 2018-01-03
Denied
B-415349
Jan 03, 2018
Jump To
VIEW DECISION
DOWNLOADS
RELATED PAGES
GAO CONTACTS
Highlights
DynCorp International LLC, of Fort Worth, Texas, protests the Department of the Army's award of a contract to M1 Support Services, of Denton, Texas, pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. W9124G-17-R-0002, to provide aircraft maintenance and support services at Fort Rucker, Alabama. DynCorp protests various aspects of the agency's source selection process, including challenges to the agency's evaluation of technical proposals, the agency's evaluation of past performance, and the agency's consideration of the awardee's experience.
We deny the protest.
We deny the protest.
View Decision
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted decision has been approved for public release.
Decision
Matter of: DynCorp International LLC
File: B-415349
Date: January 3, 2018
David M. Nadler, Esq., Adam Proujansky, Esq., Justin A. Chiarodo, Esq., Stephanie M. Harden, Esq., Philip E. Beshara, Esq., and Ioana Cristei, Esq., Blank Rome LLP, for the protester.
Craig Smith, Esq., Richard B. O’Keeffe, Jr., Esq., Moshe B. Broder, Esq., and Colin J. Cloherty, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for M1 Support Services LP, the intervenor.
Lieutenant Colonel Andrew J. Smith, Captain Douglas A. Reisinger, and Captain Harry M. Parent, Department of the Army, for the agency.
Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
1. Agency’s reliance on a calculation that quantified the benefits of offerors’ proposed enhancements to the solicitation requirements was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation.
2. Protester’s challenge to the agency’s relevancy determinations regarding the size of offerors’ prior contracts that would be considered under the past performance factor is not timely filed, and the agency’s evaluation of the protester’s past performance record was reasonable and consistent with applicable statutes and regulations.
3. Protester’s assertion that the awardee’s allegedly inadequate experience renders it incapable of performing the contract requirements constitutes a challenge to the agency’s affirmative responsibility determination and will not be considered.
DECISION
DynCorp International LLC, of Fort Worth, Texas, protests the Department of the Army’s award of a contract to M1 Support Services, of Denton, Texas, pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. W9124G-17-R-0002, to provide aircraft maintenance and support services at Fort Rucker, Alabama. DynCorp protests various aspects of the agency’s source selection process, including challenges to the agency’s evaluation of technical proposals, the agency’s evaluation of past performance, and the agency’s consideration of the awardee’s experience.
We deny the protest.
BACKGROUND
On December 15, 2016, the agency issued RFP No. W9124G-17-R-0002, seeking proposals to provide aircraft maintenance and logistical services to support flight training activities at Fort Rucker for a 1-year base performance period and nine 1-year option periods. The contract seeks to ensure the availability of between 480 and 650 rotary wing aircraft[1] to support flight training requirements for Army and Air Force aviators.[2] AR, Tab 11, Acquisition Strategy, at 4. The estimated value of the contract over the 10‑year period is approximately $5 billion. Id.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...