Amentum Parsons Logistics Services, LLC (W52P1J-16-R-0001)

B-417506.12 Sep 18, 2019 Jump To FULL REPORT VIEW DECISION RELATED PAGES GAO CONTACTS Highlights AECOM Management Services, Inc., of Germantown, Maryland, protests the award of contracts (and the issuance of task orders) in connection with the logistics civil augmentation program (LOGCAP) to Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc. (KBR) of Houston, Texas; Vectrus Systems Corporation, of Colorado Springs, Colorado; Fluor Intercontinental, Inc., of Greenville, South Carolina, and PAE-Parsons Global Logistics Services (P2GLS), of Arlington, Virginia, under request for proposals (RFP) No. W52P1J16R0001, issued by the Department of the Army for support services for U.S. military installations worldwide. AECOM argues that the agency misevaluated proposals and made unreasonable source selection decisions. Based on our review, we would have no basis to object to the agency's actions. View Decision DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Decision Matter of:  AECOM Management Services, Inc.--Advisory Opinion File:  B-417506.12 Date:  September 18, 2019 Jeffery M. Chiow, Esq., Neil H. O’Donnell, Esq., Lucas T. Hanback, Esq., Emily A. Wieser, Esq., and Cassidy Kim, Esq., Rogers Joseph O’Donnell, PC, for the protester. Lee P. Curtis, Esq., Seth H. Locke, Esq., David E. Fletcher, Esq., Eric A. Aaserud, Esq., Alexander O. Canizares, Esq., Julia M. Fox, Esq., and Brenna D. Duncan, Esq., Perkins Coie, LLP, for Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc.; Kevin P. Mullen, Esq., J. Alex Ward, Esq., James A. Tucker, Esq., Sandeep N. Nandivada, Esq., R. Locke Bell, Esq., Lauren J. Horneffer, Esq., and Caitlin A. Crujido, Esq., Morrison & Foerster LLP, for Vectrus Systems Corporation; Andrew Shipley, Esq., Stephen W. Preston, Esq., Philip E. Beshara, Esq., Souvik Saha, Esq., Matthew F. Ferraro, Esq., Elizabeth J. D’Aunno, Esq., and Chanda L. Brown, Esq., Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, for Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.; and Anuj Vohra, Esq., Christian N. Curran, Esq., Olivia L. Lynch, Esq., Zachary H. Schroeder, Esq., and Lauren H. Williams, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, for PAE-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC, intervenors. Scott A. Johnson, Esq., Alex M. Cahill, Esq., and Matthew R. Wilson, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency. Scott H. Riback, Esq., Evan D. Wesser, Esq., Edward Goldstein, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of this advisory opinion. DIGEST Protest challenging agency’s evaluation of proposals and source selection decisions provides no basis for Government Accountability Office to object to the agency’s actions where record shows agency’s evaluation and source selections were reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation and applicable statutes and regulations. DECISION AECOM Management Services, Inc.,[1] of Germantown, Maryland, protests the award of contracts (and the issuance of task orders) in connection with the logistics civil augmentation program (LOGCAP) to Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc. (KBR) of Houston, Texas; Vectrus Systems Corporation, of Colorado Springs, Colorado; Fluor Intercontinental, Inc., of Greenville, South Carolina, and PAE-Parsons Global Logistics Services (P2GLS), of Arlington, Virginia, under request for proposals (RFP) No. W52P1J16R0001, issued by the Department of the Army for support services for U.S. military installations worldwide.  AECOM argues that the agency misevaluated proposals and made unreasonable source selection decisions. Based on our review, we would have no basis to object to the agency’s actions for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND AECOM, along with several other concerns, filed a protest in our Office relating to the agency’s actions in connection with this acquisition.  We denied the protest of one of the other protesters in an earlier decision.  DynCorp International, LLC, B-417506, B‑417506.10, July 31, 2019, 2019 CPD ¶ __.  DynCorp then filed a protest with the United States Court of Federal Claims, and in the wake of that protest, we dismissed AECOM’s original protest.  At the request of the Court, Motion Requesting GAO’s Advisory Opinion, Aug.