Seaward Services, Inc. (N32205-20-R-3004)
Case: B-420580
Agency: Department of the Navy : Military Sealift Command
Protester: Seaward Services, Inc.
Date: 2022-06-13
Sustained
B-420580,B-420580.2
Jun 13, 2022
Jump To
FULL REPORT
VIEW DECISION
RELATED PAGES
GAO CONTACTS
Highlights
Seaward Services, Inc. (SSI), of Norfolk, Virginia, protests the award of a contract to TOTE Services, LLC, of Jacksonville, Florida, under request for proposals (RFP) No. N32205-20-R-3004, issued by the Department of the Navy, Military Sealift Command, for services in connection with the worldwide operation, maintenance and repair of the USNS Guam. SSI maintains that the agency unreasonably evaluated proposals and made an unreasonable source selection decision.
We sustain the protest.
View Decision
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release.
Decision
Matter of: Seaward Services, Inc.
File: B-420580; B-420580.2
Date: June 13, 2022
Michael L. Waldman, Esq., Deneen J. Melander, Esq., and Leslie C. Esbrook, Esq., Kramer Levin Neftalis & Frankel, LLP d/b/a Kramer Levin Robbins Russel, for the protester.
Howard W. Roth, Esq., Jedidiah K. Blake, Esq., and Nicole Wolf, Esq., Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker, LLP, for TOTE Services, LLC, an intervenor.
Davis Young, Esq., Patrick Mayette, Esq., DJ Thornley, Esq., Ann Caroline M. Calabrese, Esq., Courtney E. Hall, Esq., and James L. Johnsen, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
Scott H. Riback, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Protest challenging agency’s evaluation of proposals and source selection decision is sustained where record shows that agency’s evaluation and source selection was unreasonable and not consistent with the terms of the solicitation.
DECISION
Seaward Services, Inc. (SSI), of Norfolk, Virginia, protests the award of a contract to TOTE Services, LLC, of Jacksonville, Florida, under request for proposals (RFP) No. N32205-20-R-3004, issued by the Department of the Navy, Military Sealift Command, for services in connection with the worldwide operation, maintenance and repair of the USNS Guam. SSI maintains that the agency unreasonably evaluated proposals and made an unreasonable source selection decision.
We sustain the protest.
BACKGROUND
The RFP contemplates the award of a fixed-price contract on a best-value tradeoff basis for a 1-year base period and four 1-year options. Firms were advised that the agency would evaluate proposals and make award based on price, as well as several non-price factors. The non-price factors were divided among several pass/fail considerations (not relevant to the protest issues), and two “tradeoff” factors, technical approach and past performance (deemed relatively equal in importance); the two non-price “tradeoff” factors together were deemed significantly more important than price. RFP at 212-218.[1]
The agency received proposals from SSI and TOTE. The agency evaluated the proposals, engaged in two rounds of discussions, and solicited, obtained and evaluated final proposal revisions.[2] After completing its evaluation, the agency assigned the following ratings:
Pass/Fail Considerations
Technical Approach
Past Performance
Price
SSI
Pass/Acceptable
Good
Satisfactory
$45,606,758
TOTE
Pass/Acceptable
Good
Satisfactory
$39,066,900
Agency Report (AR) Exh. 63, Source Selection Decision Document (SSDD), at 4. On the basis of these evaluation results, the agency made award to TOTE, finding that its proposal represented the best value to the government. After being advised of the selection decision and requesting and receiving a debriefing, SSI filed this protest.
DISCUSSION
The USNS Guam, the ship that the successful contractor will operate, maintain and repair here, is a large, high-speed transport vessel with a catamaran (dual) hull constructed of aluminum, categorized as an expeditionary fast transport craft capable of sustained, high-speed travel in an open ocean environment. Because of its unique characteristics, the RFP specifically provided for evaluation of the offerors’ experience and past performance in connection with operating and maintaining aluminum-hulled vessels.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...