General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. (N0003923R5555)

Case: B-422272 Agency: Department of the Navy : Naval Information Warfare Systems Command Protester: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. Date: 2024-03-15 Denied
View full decision with AI analysis on ProtestIntel →
B-422272,B-422272.2 Mar 15, 2024 Jump To FULL REPORT VIEW DECISION RELATED PAGES GAO CONTACTS Highlights General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., (GDIT) of Falls Church, Virginia, protests the issuance of a task order to International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) of Bethesda, Maryland, under request for proposals (RFP) No. N0003923R5555, issued by the Department of the Navy, Naval Information Warfare Systems Command, for development, operations, and sustainment services. The protester primarily challenges the rejection of its proposal under the cost evaluation factor. The protester also challenges various other aspects of the agency's selection process, including the agency's decision not to conduct discussions, the evaluation of the awardee's cost proposal, and the award decision. We deny the protest. View Decision DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Decision Matter of: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. File: B-422272; B-422272.2 Date: March 15, 2024 Noah B. Bleicher, Esq., Moshe B. Broder, Esq., Andrew L. Balland, Esq., and Sierra A. Paskins, Esq., Jenner & Block, LLP, for the protester. J. Andrew Jackson, Esq., Ryan P. McGovern, Esq., Robyn B. Celestino, Esq., and Shelbie Rose, Esq., Jones Day, for International Business Machines Corporation, the intervenor. Michelle S. Bennett, Esq., Lisa DeBolt, Esq., and Karen DeBolt, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency. April Y. Shields, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest challenging the agency’s cost realism evaluation, which found the protester’s proposal materially noncompliant with the solicitation, is denied where the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation and applicable procurement law and regulation. 2. Protest challenging the agency’s decision not to conduct discussions is denied where the solicitation provided that the agency intended to make award without discussions and no statute or regulation required the agency to conduct discussions. 3. Protest challenging the agency’s cost realism evaluation of the awardee’s proposal is denied where the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation and applicable procurement law and regulation. 4. Protester is not an interested party to raise other challenges to the agency’s evaluation and award decision where, due to being materially noncompliant under the cost evaluation factor, it would not be eligible for award. DECISION General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., (GDIT) of Falls Church, Virginia, protests the issuance of a task order to International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) of Bethesda, Maryland, under request for proposals (RFP) No. N0003923R5555, issued by the Department of the Navy, Naval Information Warfare Systems Command, for development, operations, and sustainment services. The protester primarily challenges the rejection of its proposal under the cost evaluation factor. The protester also challenges various other aspects of the agency’s selection process, including the agency’s decision not to conduct discussions, the evaluation of the awardee’s cost proposal, and the award decision. We deny the protest. BACKGROUND The agency issued the RFP on June 22, 2023, under the General Services Administration (GSA) Alliant 2 governmentwide acquisition contract (GWAC) vehicle and pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) section 16.505 procedures. Agency Report (AR), exh. 1, RFP at 72.[1] According to the RFP, the agency is engaged in efforts to transform “a complex family of systems that enable the Navy to perform HR [human resources] and other non-tactical business operations ashore and afloat,” which the agency refers to more commonly as “MyNavy HR.” AR, exh. 2, RFP, Performance Work Statement (PWS) at 1. As part of those efforts, the agency intends to evolve its current MyNavy HR support environment from over 200 “legacy applications” to “a cloud-based architecture comprised of five systems”--one of which is the “Authoritative Data Environment (ADE),” which the RFP explains is “the next step in the evolution of the Navy’s objective to provide an enterprise level authoritative data warehouse and data services.” Id. at 1-2. In this context, the RFP seeks a contractor to provide various information technology services to support the development, operations, and sustainment of the ADE; among other things, the contractor would be expected to support “all aspects of the Systems Development Life Cycle [ ] such as development, integration, testing, implementation, and sustainment of ADE capabilities.” Id.

Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...